Friday, January 2, 2015

How Target Turned Business Around

girl shopping targetJessica Rinaldi/Reuters
Target's business is on fire. 
The discount retailer's shares rose an impressive 19% this year. Recent sales results have also topped Wall Street's estimates.
Target made several important decisions to turn around business, according to Brian Yarbrough, consumer analyst at Edward Jones.
Yarbrough told Business Insider how the company was able to get customers back in stores.

1. Hiring a new CEO.

Target CEO Gregg Steinhafel resigned after a tumultuous reign that included the company's massive data breach and botched Canadian expansion. 
He was replaced by PepsiCo veteran Brian Cornell. 
Since taking the helm in September, Cornell has successfully implemented a strategy that takes Target back to its roots. 
"Bringing in the new CEO was the first step for Target," Yarbrough said. "He has a creative new perspective and isn't afraid to take risks." 

2. Changing up product.

In recent years, Target made the mistake of pushing consumer staples like toilet paper and laundry detergent.
"You aren't going to beat Wal-Mart and Amazon in those categories," Yarbrough said. "People don't go to Target for cheap food."
Under Cornell's leadership, Target has started focusing on "cheap chic" home decor and apparel. 
This strategy is more likely to attract Target's demographic, according to Yarbrough. 

3. Adopting a new plan in Canada. 

Target has struggled to gain traction in Canada.
But that could change under Cornell, according to Yarbrough.
"Target Canada's future can only get better," Yarbrough said. 
The company will either close underperforming stores, or implement a new strategy to drive profits. 

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Starbucks Has A Brilliant Plan To Win Over Coffee Snobs

15953011451_fa744c0494_cFlickr/Jeff WilcoxThe Seattle Reserve Roastery.
Nine blocks away from the original Starbucks location, in a renovated 1920s-era building, stands a 15,000 square foot statement of Starbucks' heritage of coffee innovation and its soaring ambitions for the future: the Seattle Reserve Roastery.
The Roastery offers visitors the experience of small lot coffee served in a variety of formats designed to appeal to coffee connoisseurs, including pour over, Chemex, Clover, siphon, French press, and other high-end brewing methods.
The presentation occurs in a welcoming atmosphere, to make it nonthreatening for loyal customers to learn about the company's small lot coffees.
All Reserve coffee for Starbucks locations will be roasted in this location, which the company says will equal about 1.4 million pounds of small lot coffee in 2015. Reserve coffees are currently featured in 22 dedicated locations worldwide, and Starbucks will add 100 more in the next five years.
Starbucks has described the Roastery, in which a customer can follow the path of green unroasted beans through the building, as a "Willy Wonka" experience.
This may be so, but the convergence of  ubiquitous piping, small Probat roasters, tasting areas, and siphon brewing stations around the central pounded-copper silo seems to recall an era of bygone industrialism, with a hint of steampunk thrown in:

Margins trump street cred

For all this, among the coffee elite, Starbucks barely gets a nod when leading U.S. coffee roasters are discussed. Scroll through any lists of the highest regarded roasters, and you'll see that companies like Counter Culture, Intelligentsia, and Stumptown -- each minuscule in comparison to Starbucks -- are the literal taste-setters among purists. These coffee innovators pioneered fair and direct trade practices, opened cupping rooms and training centers to spread coffee knowledge to both customers and baristas, and popularized alternative brewing methods.
But wait a moment, didn't Starbucks also engage in the above practices? And hasn't Starbucks poured a billion dollars into ensuring that its coffee will be 100% ethically sourced by 2015? The truth may be that the company will always be seen by independent roasters and coffee connoisseurs as a mass market purveyor. But that won't stop Howard Schultz and the Starbucks management team from exercising their vision, and taking pride in the position Starbucks holds in the coffee world today. 
That position will only amplify in the years to come, especially when one considers the company's profitability. Selling higher margin coffees in limited batches at exclusive Reserve locations certainly won't hurt profits, but the long-term benefit derives from educating masses of coffee drinkers about higher end, more labor-intensive brewing methods, and creating a yen for more subtle coffee flavors.
Thus, exclusive Reserve locations are designed to kindle a desire in customers to enjoy a theoretically better-tasting cup of coffee at their home base, neighborhood cafes. The company has expanded the number of stores offering its proprietary Clover brewing system to nearly 1,000 in 2014, and global Reserve coffee availability will grow from 800 to 1,500 stores by the end of FY 2015. So while the Roastery and Reserve tasting stores may be a proud statement of Starbuck's artisanal credentials, they're also the tip of the company's spear in meticulously and patiently moving consumers up the coffee chain.
Consider that a Reserve coffee brewed via a nondrip process sells at a 100% premium or higher to the typical Starbucks brewed coffee. A tall (12 ounce) brewed cup of the company's standard Pike's Place or Blonde Roast sells for roughly $1.75 in my own city, whereas a similarly sized Reserve lot coffee brewed on a Clover sells for between $3.25 and $3.75. 
When Starbucks began offering pour-over method coffee in its stores in 2010, some wondered if this would backfire, as the company had built its empire on funneling customers through the gauntlet of its early morning coffee lines. But management has utilized coffee premiumization to its advantage, promoting pour-overs, Clover-brewed coffee, and other slow production methods during off-peak hours.
It's a powerful formula: push higher margin products during dayparts in which the labor capacity is underutilized. Extrapolate this math as the global coffee drinking population yields to Starbucks' premium coffee evangelism, and one can see why the Roastery in Seattle is simultaneously a shrine to coffee engineering, and the crux of the roasters' future margin ambitions.

Ways to Green the Food Supply Chain

Converting farm waste into energy is one of the most efficient ways to reduce our carbon footprint. It was reported that the process of converting waste into energy or farm fuel can end up generating as much as twenty eight billion dollars in 2016. With this in mind, farmers and distributors are working their way towards greening the food supply. To expand on the statistics and technologies surrounding this cause, I would like to bring to your attention an infographic created by Marylhurst University's Green MBA program titled, "Ways to Green the Food Supply Chain." 


 

Megatrends collisions: introducing the sharing economy

The collisions between megatrends can create new and disruptive environments. Consumers increasingly value access over ownership. This trend is currently playing out in a dynamic collection of sectors that is often labelled “the sharing economy”.

The sharing economy is being enabled by the collision of four main megatrends:
Megatrends collisions
View the infographic here
Technological breakthroughs makes online sharing economy platforms possible and reduces transaction costs.  It also allows for more precise measurement of spare capacity and for connections to occur between owners and those who are looking for services and products, such as travellers using airbnb to find spare rooms in their destination.
Climate change and resource scarcity increases the opportunity cost of “owning” versus “accessing” products and services. Consumers are also becoming more environmentally conscious of the impact of their purchasing decisions, for example, preferring car sharing over ownership to lower their carbon footprint.
Rapid urbanisation creates the critical mass that many sharing economy platforms need in order to become viable business propositions. For example, car and ride sharing services are only profitable in areas of high population density.
Demographic and social change - today’s online platforms use peer review systems to effectively self-regulate quality. Consumers are becoming more comfortable in sourcing trust from these mechanisms (in the case of peer-to-peer lending, users are even willing to lend 'strangers' thousands of pounds). At the same time, status in society is increasingly gained through experiences rather than simply ownership of tangible goods.
The sharing economy poses big questions for established businesses trying to avoid disruption, new entrants looking to scale their offering and policy makers trying to regulate and manage the market.
We’re currently engaging a range of influencers to identify the steps organisations and policy makers need to take to succeed in the sharing economy. We’ll be launching more of our thinking about this over the summer but if you’d like to join the debate now, please get in touch with David Lancefield.

Cross-channel inventory management now retail’s top challenge

Link to: Cross-channel inventory management now retail’s top challenge
A survey of retailers by Retail Systems Research (RSR) has found that the proper implementation of inventory and order management has now eclipsed data management as the biggest single challenge facing retailers.
The study, ‘Omni-Channel Retail 2014: Double Trouble’, was backed by SAP-owned ecommerce vendor Hybris, and contains analysis of the business drivers, opportunities and organisational constraints surrounding retailers’ omni-channel strategies.
Results showed that while 93% of retailers rated system-wide inventory visibility as the most significant capability in executing their omni-channel fulfilment strategy, currently just 45% can enable this. Additionally, only 39% are making this happen via system synchronisation across all channels.
The ‘Omni-Channel Retail 2014: Double Trouble’ research yielded three key findings:
  1. Retail ‘winners’ design the digital experience with the dual objective of transacting more sales in the digital space and driving more sales in the physical store,
  2. omni-channel fulfilment has become a top priority for retailers; 53% want to allow customers to purchase, take delivery or return a product through the channel of their choice, and
  3. fulfilment agility requires modifications to operational systems and processes to efficiently support anytime/anywhere consumer shopping expectations.

Additional research findings are presented in this infographic, provided by Hybris:
infographic-rsr-report

Stated methodology: The RSR report, sponsored by hybris, sets out to analyse the challenges retailers face delivering an always-on, omni-channel customer experience and what differentiates retail ‘winners’ from retail ‘laggards’. An online survey was conducted between April-July 2014 and received answers from 83 qualified retail respondents. Respondents included executive/senior managers (C-Level or VP) and middle managers (VP/Director/Manager), representing retail organizations with revenues ranging from in excess of $5 billion to less than $50 million and with a retail presence in North America (USA and Canada), Latin America, as well as the UK, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia/Pacific. 

COMBINING CLICKS WITH BRICK-AND-MORTAR RETAIL

shopping-sb3-12-29
pymnts_p
What's Next In Payments®
6:15 AM EST December 29th, 2014
By all accounts, Santa delivered for retailers this holiday season.  According to the National Retail Federation, retailers pulled in $616.9 billion in revenue this holiday season, a 4.1 percent jump from 2013 and the strongest gain in three years. Though there are some voices suggesting that the season could have packed more of a wallop revenue-wise, most retailers seem grateful that the spending this year – fueled by an improving economy, higher wages, consumer confidence and cheaper gas – delivered a solid showing.
“This is overall a good holiday, particularly when you combine online with in-store sales. The consumers are in a very good frame of mind — there are a lot of things helping us feel better about spending again.”
Increased optimism among the spending base is good news for retailers, and a welcome change to the consumer frame of mind. That, however, wasn’t the only change that merchants had to absorb in 2014. While physical locations still dominate the retail landscape and retail spend, the e-commerce boost that contributed to holiday shopping this year only underscores the undeniable appeal of ordering online.
E-commerce numbers were up around 15 percent between Nov. 1-Dec. 21 according to comScore, and analyst estimates for the entire holiday season project e-commerce up by between 13 and 14 percent. Moreover, that traffic is being increasingly driven by mobile devices like smartphones and tablets – Amazon reported 60 percent of its holiday traffic originated from mobile devices, and 70 percent of Wal-Mart’s online sales were originated from mobile devices.
“Mobile continues to accelerate the secular shift from offline to online purchases, in our view, as consumer use-cases for last minute shopping, in-store purchases, and price comparison continue to expand,” Investment analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co Colin Sebastian noted.
And traditional retailers are trying hard to cash in and not lose out on serving this new mobile consumer.
The most popular approach taken in 2014 was “omnichannel.” Omnichannel merchants can make it to buy online and on mobile, but pick-up in a local store (as opposed to waiting for delivery) and compete with the convenience of the online order. Not to mention getting consumers into a physical store, which is where they can be tempted to buy more.
“I would rather have customers in the store,” said Terry Lundgren , chief executive of Macy’s Inc. “They will always find something in the store that they didn’t intend to buy, and, hopefully, those impulse items will carry the day.”
However, while the omnichannel solution has some obvious “everyone wins” qualities to it, it also comes with incumbent challenges.  Mega-online retailers like Amazon maintain a large network of warehouses and distribution centers and Amazon Prime benefits that get merchandise to consumers in two days, in some areas, the same day and in limited markets, within an hour of purchase. Physical retailers that lack either the resources or the will to emulate that instead use a mixed model of distribution centers and retail locations to fill their orders. The problem is efficiencies possible in tightly packed, highly automated warehouse are hard to reproduce with inventory spread across stores built for live customers. Things aren’t always where they should be and it can be difficult for retail staff, who are also serving the needs of physically present (and often irritable) customers, to also do the job of inventory tracker.
Emily Merritt is a ship-from-store supervisor for a Wal-Mart Supercenter in Springfield, Missouri. According to The Wall Street Journal “she walks about 5 miles every shift, steering around other shoppers with help from instructions on a tablet computer. But she’s also required to greet any customer within 10 feet and answer any questions they have… Ms. Merritt and her team handle about 1,000 items a day from the one store. At some robot-equipped Amazon warehouses, workers handle as many as 300 items an hour.”
So what’s a traditional retailer to do?
Some have opted for other solutions. Macy’s uses its sales staff to handle online orders in the hours before the store opens so as not to disrupt the flow of regular physical commerce. Target is limiting the number of deliveries per store per day.
“This is the first year,” said Jason Goldberger, head of Target.com, which is shipping orders from 136 of the company’s 1,800 U.S. stores. “We’ll learn.”
That learning curve may be flattened by a wave of start-ups geared at bridging the gap between the physical retailer and the potential online customer in close proximity. A complaint about the omnichannel experience is that it’s not actually easier than just shopping in-store. According to The Wall Street Journal article, it took a consumer about eight minutes to pick up an item ordered online as opposed to only five minutes to just go in and get it. Innovators with apps like Curbside seek to fix that problem.
Curbside allows users to make orders online and then alerts them when their items are available for pick-up. Consumers then have their items delivered to them, well, curbside – tracking made possible via GPS and their mobile app sort of like Uber allows consumers to track the process of their drivers when en route. The app is currently available to use through Target.
Instacart allows users get groceries delivered instantly from big and small supermarkets. Postmates delivers a variety of goods – including food, household items, groceries and flowers – same day (and rather quickly according to most reviews).
However, while third-party apps solve some of the logistical problems associated with curbside pick-up or same day delivery, they fail to deliver the biggest benefit to the physical retailer – a consumer in-store.
But, as The Journal noted “retailers have to try.”
“Starting from scratch can be quite capital intensive and building a new online fulfillment center comes with an entry price of at least $100 million,” said Debbie Fortnum, senior vice president of supply chain at Belk Inc., which fulfills online orders from 50 of its 300 department stores. “The longer you can defer expenses and make sure to leverage existing assets like stores, the better.”
So what’s next for 2015?
Likely more physical retailers trying to figure out how to best leverage their assets – physical locations, inventory, sales associates, and now innovators with the ability to replicate the delivery convenience of their online competitors – to maintain their retail advantage.

Many stores don't know what's in stock


Did your gift get stuck in the "ghost economy"?
If it didn't arrive or one you wanted was out of stock when you got to the store, you may have been a victim of retailers' outdated digital inventory systems. These systems make things that aren't really in stock appear to be there when consumers check online, says retail expert Kevin Sterneckert.
Weather isn't turning out to be the problem for gift delivery that it was last Christmas or in some other recent holiday periods. While parts of the central U.S. were expected to get snow leading up to Christmas, it wasn't likely to cause delivery issues, and the rain soaking the East coast wasn't either.
That makes inventory management the likeliest culprit when gifts don't show up.
Few stores have updated their inventory-monitoring technology so they get an accurate picture of current inventory. That means a product can appear in stock in the middle of the day — to a store clerk or consumer checking on the company's website for that store — but really has been ordered online overnight by a customer who chose the "pick up in store" option, says Sterneckert.
"What retailers need is technology that shows their available inventory in real time" across the stores, website and mobile devices, says Sterneckert, a former analyst for technology research firm Gartner. "Any delay means information is wrong."
About 25% of products consumers see on retail websites at any given time are out of stock, estimates retail technology company Order Dynamics. During the holidays, the that rises to 30%.

This is what bedeviled Best Buy three years ago when it had to cancel orders right before Christmas for products people had ordered weeks earlier that turned out to be out of stock.
Most retailers electronically update their inventory only once a day. That means that products that show up as in stock in a store during a day may have been sold or set aside for others who arranged for in-store pickup.
Walmart and Macy's are among the exceptions, with Walmart leading the way with inventory updates, says Sterneckert.
Macy's CEO Terry Lundgren has said that "inventory optimization" is a top priority. That is, making sure what people want is where they want it, whether it's in the right store or online, and that employees have complete visibility into what's in stock.
Walmart spokesman Bao Nguyen calls it "inventory refresh" and says the inventory on Walmart.com is updated more frequently than every 15 minutes. Employees at Walmart Labs and Walmart.com at the company's San Bruno, Calif., offices developed the "sophisticated inventory tools," he says.
They can't catch everything, of course. Dana Pugsley of Eastaboga, Ala., thought she bought a $228 Hisense TV the night before Thanksgiving from Walmart.com. She says the money was taken from her Paypal account, she got a confirmation e-mail and was told she could pick up the TV that evening. But an hour later, she was told the TV was out of stock at the store she wanted to pick it up and was never given the chance to pick it up anywhere else. Without access to her money for six days, Pugsley says she couldn't buy other Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals and had to pay more for another TV later at Target.
"Though we are looking into the specifics of that case, our inventory tools we built for Walmart.com are solid and sophisticated," says Nguyen. "We're always working to make them better so our merchants can serve customers."
Sterneckert, chief marketing officer at Order Dynamics, had a better outcome. He was shopping Monday at a Best Buy looking for fit bands. The store had what he wanted in stock, but when he got there, there weren't any on shelves, and one employee's handheld device showed it was out of stock. But an inventory manager at the store could see a new shipment came in and went in back to get one for him.