Eating Towns, Drinking Towns
Jed Kolko, Trulia Chief Economist
In his latest real
estate data mashup, Trulia’s
Chief Economist reveals where are the best places to live for eating out and
drinking based on the restaurant and bar density.
What are you doing tonight? Will you
and your friends be going out to eat or meeting for a drink? Like everything
else, where you hang out depends on where you live. Using Census data, we found
the metros with the highest density of restaurants and bars, adjusting for the
number of households (details at end of post). We didn’t try to measure quality
since that’s a matter of personal taste, and the best-restaurant or
favorite-bar debate can get fierce. Instead, we focused on the quantity of
restaurants and bars that locals can choose from. Look at the top 10 lists
below: some places are eating towns, and others are drinking towns, but few are
both.
Eating Towns
San Francisco
has the most restaurants of all large metros in the U.S., adjusted for the
number of households. No other major metro comes close: at 39.3 per 10,000
households, San Francisco
has nearly 50% more restaurants relative to its size than #2 Fairfield County, CT (the southwest corner of the state nearest New York City). All of the top eating towns
are on or near the ocean. If you want lots of restaurants to choose from, move
toward the coasts.
Top
Metros for Eating Out
|
|||
#
|
U.S. Metro
|
Restaurants per 10,000 households
|
Median price per square foot of
homes listed for sale
|
1
|
39.3
|
$459
|
|
2
|
Fairfield County, CT
|
27.6
|
$222
|
3
|
26.5
|
$217
|
|
4
|
New York, NY-NJ
|
25.3
|
$275
|
5
|
Seattle,
WA
|
24.9
|
$150
|
6
|
24.8
|
$319
|
|
7
|
Orange County, CA
|
24.8
|
$260
|
8
|
24.3
|
$146
|
|
9
|
24.2
|
$219
|
|
10
|
Portland, OR-WA
|
24.0
|
$129
|
Note: among the 100 largest metros.
Living in a great eating town isn’t
cheap: homes for sale in seven
of the top 10 eating towns have a median price per square foot of $200 or more.
Why are eating towns more expensive? Many people are willing to pay more to
live near restaurants. But, more importantly, high-income people have more
money to spend on eating out, so the high-cost places where high-income people
tend to live can support more restaurants.
Three of the top eating towns are
somewhat more affordable, with home prices averaging less than $200 per square
foot: Seattle,
Providence RI and Portland OR. Each has
a thriving and innovative local food scene. Lots of young chefs choose these
smaller cities because it’s cheaper to start up restaurants there than in more
expensive markets like San Francisco and New York. And it doesn’t hurt that Providence is the
home of Johnson & Wales University, a well-known cooking school.
Beyond the largest 100 metros, small
vacation towns often have lots of restaurants relative to their size because
they cater to a large tourist or seasonal population. Ocean City NJ, Cape Cod MA and Myrtle Beach SC all have
even more restaurants, relative to their size, than San Francisco.
Looking across large and small
metros, the map shows that America’s eating towns are on the coasts. Most
metros up and down the coasts — from Miami to Boston and from Seattle to San Diego – have at least 20 restaurants per
10,000 households. Most inland metros have fewer — or much fewer — than that.
Drinking Towns
Where do people go out to drink
their calories instead? The top drinking towns – based on the number of bars
adjusted for the number of households – is a totally different list than the
top eating towns. New Orleans
tops the list, followed by six Midwest (Milwaukee and Toledo) or near-Midwest (Omaha, Pittsburgh, Buffalo and Syracuse) metros. Only San Francisco makes
the top 10 list for both eating and drinking towns. Unlike the top eating
towns, only two of the top drinking towns – San Francisco and Honolulu – are near or on the ocean.
Top
Metros for Drinking
|
|||
#
|
U.S. Metro
|
Bars per 10,000 households
|
Median price per square foot of
homes listed for sale
|
1
|
8.6
|
$99
|
|
2
|
8.5
|
$109
|
|
3
|
Omaha, NE-IA
|
8.3
|
$79
|
4
|
7.9
|
$91
|
|
5
|
7.2
|
$71
|
|
6
|
7.0
|
$86
|
|
7
|
6.8
|
$91
|
|
8
|
6.0
|
$459
|
|
9
|
6.0
|
$69
|
|
10
|
5.9
|
$390
|
Note: among the 100 largest metros.
The top-drinking towns are much more
affordable than the top-eating towns. The median home price per square foot is
below $100 in seven of the top 10 drinking towns, with Milwaukee at $109 coming close. In contrast,
none of the top eating towns have a median price per square foot under $100.
Seattle, Providence RI and Portland OR may be affordable eating towns relative
to San Jose and Boston, but they’re still pricier than
nearly all of the top drinking towns.
Among smaller metros, four have more than 10 bars per 10,000 households: Duluth MN, Green Bay WI, Appleton WI and Racine WI. Other western New York state and western Pennsylvania metros are also chock-full of bars. The map shows that the top metros for bars are clustered in the Midwest, Great Lakes and Plains. Outside these regions, southern Louisiana, western & central Massachusetts, and Oregon also have high concentrations of bars, but much of the South is close to dry.
In short: if you want to live near
restaurants, choose the east or west coast, but be prepared to pay high housing
costs. If you want to live near bars, look in or near the Midwest or in the
handful of other regions where bars cluster. If you want both, San Francisco is your
best option: it’s the only large metro on the top 10 list for both restaurants
and bars. But it’s also the most expensive real estate market in the country.
As we economists love to say: there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.
How did we do this? We divided the
number of restaurants and bars by the number of households in each metro area
and then multiplied by 10,000. The number of restaurants and bars are reported
in County Business Patterns. Restaurants include only full-service restaurants, which
are “establishments primarily engaged in providing food services to patrons who
order and are served while seated (i.e., waiter/waitress service) and pay after
eating” (North American Industry Classification System – or NAICS — code 7221).
Bars include “establishments primarily engaged in preparing and serving
alcoholic beverages for immediate consumption” (NAICS code 7224).
No comments:
Post a Comment