Friday, May 30, 2014

Coca Cola

The CEO of Coca-Cola on Using the Company’s Scale for Good

Recent research shows spending money on corporate social responsibility is no longer seen as a detriment to a company’s profitability. Stock analysts now view such expenditures as essential to a company’s long-term brand and value. Coca-Cola is one of the many companies that are making efforts to tackle the world’s greatest societal challenges — water scarcity, climate change, and even the rights of women and girls in the developing world. Muhtar Kent, the Chairman of the Board and CEO of Coca-Cola since 2009, talks about how the beverage company is imbedding sustainability into its business.
Over the past several years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has evolved from simply being an isolated “do good” arm of a company to something more profound that’s changing the way organizations do business every day. How has Coca-Cola integrated these CSR principles into your operations?
KENT: Sustainability isn’t new to us but we’ve been intensifying our focus on it. We’re prioritizing programs centered on water, women and well-being—all three of which are essential to our business. For example, we’re working to achieve water neutrality by 2020. So far, we’ve replaced 52% of the water we use in making our beverages and reducing water usage across our 800-plus bottling plants helps reduce the overall cost of production. We have also committed to economically empowering 5 million women by 2020. This is the largest such program ever undertaken by a commercial organization. Our micro distribution centers (MDCs) in Africa, many of which are run by women, help our beverages reach small shops and kiosks that can’t be served by more trucks and vans and create value for our business, our retail and restaurant customers, and the broader communities.
Restructuring a company to focus on sustainability doesn’t happen overnight, so how long did it take to get everyone on board and how did you deal with any resistance to change?
Sustainability can no longer be a compliance measure or a “nice-to-do”; it’s now a business planning imperative with measures, goals, and explicit value connected to our programs. Because of this importance, we didn’t really experience any resistance. There were certainly people who challenged our approach and provided candid feedback on how we could improve but overall there was collective agreement that this was necessary.
If the ultimate goal is to create both economic value and social value, how do you strike that balance?
There may be an initial financial investment that doesn’t create an immediate and direct financial return—that’s OK. We know that by investing today, we will ultimately be a stronger, more sustainable business down the line. For example, developing our PlantBottle innovation — a fully recyclable packaging made of up to 30% renewable plant material — took significant upfront investment but we felt it made good sense, especially with oil prices fluctuating. And it’s helping contribute to our goal of reducing the carbon footprint of the drink in a consumer’s hand by 25% by 2020. It has also been a tremendous boost to our Dasani water brand, helping us win new customers and consumers.
Have you faced any specific challenges in measuring the social value you’re creating?
Coca-Cola operates in more than 200 countries and the needs of each market depend on a variety of factors. While some markets face economic issues, others may face resource scarcity and gender inequality, and some face all of these issues and more. It can be difficult to measure and compare. Thus, we operate a value creation model that is globally driven but locally focused.
Can you explain what you mean by a “value creation model”?
I mean one that creates value for all the stakeholders touched by our business. Consider PlantBottle. We’re able to put a package in consumers’ hands that reduces demand for oil. If consumers love our beverage more, that benefits our customers. And when the packaging is less expensive and we’re less dependent on petroleum-based plastic, this creates value for our shareowners and our bottling partners.
What is Coca-Cola doing that’s different from what other companies are doing?
There are a lot of companies and organizations out there doing great work but our scale allows us to think big and execute. It’s not just our size as a company or a brand, but the fact that we have operations in more than 200 countries. This footprint enables us to set up partnerships with organizations large and small to make the greatest local or global impact. We can fund projects at levels that make a real difference. And often times, we can use the size and nature of our operating model to address a need in a significant way.
We also have our distribution network, which connects us directly to the 24 million retail customers we visit every week. As the world strives to bridge the gap of the last mile between the virtual world and the real world, we have an opportunity to help make this connection. We’re continuously working to make the most of our distribution network as well as our virtual and physical assets.
How much of your company’s move in this direction is customer-driven vs. conscience-driven?
Today’s consumers expect companies to be socially responsible — not just on the surface either. Our brand is in our consumers’ hands but that’s not the primary reason for our sustainability efforts. Our efforts are primarily fueled by our business needs — we can only be as sustainable as the communities we serve so we’ve initiated a host of programs and partnerships to help strengthen those communities while continuing to build our business.
We also have ethical drivers for our sustainability work. Across Coca-Cola, we are parents, partners, siblings, friends, concerned citizens — and we live in the communities where we operate. We have a responsibility to help others.
How has your organization gone about partnering both at the local level and at the national level to ensure that the social value you’re creating on the ground is recognized and supported with policies and governance?
We work with governments, civil society organizations, and other companies. It’s essential to invite the groups that influence policy and governance to be part of the initial conversations so they share ownership from the start. Plus these organizations often have valuable local intelligence and experience
Consider our work in Tanzania with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. In 2010 we joined forces to improve access to critical medicines. Working with the Tanzania’s Medical Stores Department and others, we were able to share our supply chain expertise, reduce medicine bottlenecks, and improve distribution as a whole.  We try to use our expertise and know-how to make a positive difference in the communities we serve.
Looking at businesses and consumers of the future—10, 20, 30 years from now—what will happen to organizations that fail to integrate social and environmental concerns into the core of their daily operations?
In my opinion, the importance of balancing social and economic value will only grow over time and organizations that don’t do this will fail. They’ll lack the resiliency to address ever-changing consumer attitudes and shifts in geopolitics, economics, and demographics.
For Coca-Cola, many of the most exciting opportunities are likely to come from the intersection of sustainability and our supply chain, giving us new ways to reduce our packaging, energy, and water footprints and improve the well-being of the communities we serve. While we’ve gained some good momentum with initiatives like 5by20EKOCENTER and PlantBottle, we know we’re just getting started. Sustainability is an ongoing journey, one that we hope and trust will build forward momentum as we remain “constructively discontent.”
What do you mean by “constructively discontent”?
It’s my way of recognizing achievement but also understanding that we can never be satisfied with it. We must refuse to accept the status quo and continue to challenge ourselves. We have to keep setting higher goals and expectations and then meet or exceed them. And at the end of the day, we need to operate with a lens of optimism, but temper it with a lens of reality.
This is part of an ongoing series from Harvard Business Review and the Skoll World Forum on how mega-corporations are integrating innovative ways to solve social and environmental problems into their core operations. 

Consumer Spending

Consumer Spending in U.S. Unexpectedly Declines


Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Shoppers in Santa Monica, California.






Consumer spending unexpectedly fell in April after the biggest surge in almost five years as incomes slowed, a sign the largest part of the U.S. economy will take time to accelerate.
Household purchases, which account for about 70 percent of the economy, dropped 0.1 percent, the first decrease in a year, after a revised 1 percent gain the prior month that was the strongest reading since August 2009, Commerce Department figures showed today inWashington. The median forecast of 77 economists in a Bloomberg survey called for a 0.2 percent April rise. Incomes advanced 0.3 percent after climbing 0.5 percent.
Today’s report underscores the need for faster progress in the job market that would spur wage gains and provide more households with the means to spend. At the same time, March and April figures together paint a picture of steady demand that’s helping companies such as Lowe’s Cos. (LOW), signaling purchases will contribute to the economy’s rebound this quarter. “A lot of pent-up activity took place in March and now we’re coming back to more normal levels of spending,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Pierpont Securities LLC in Stamford,Connecticut. Stanley was one of economists who correctly predicted the decline. “The risk at this point is that the consumer is falling back into a pattern of mediocre spending growth.”
Photographer: Sam Hodgson/Bloomberg
Nordstrom Inc., the largest U.S. luxury department-store chain, this month reported...Read More
Today’s figures showed that adjusting consumer spending for inflation, which generates the figures used to calculate gross domestic product, purchases fell 0.3 percent in April, the most since September 2009.

Stock Futures

Stock-index futures held losses after the figures, with the contract on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index maturing in June falling 0.1 percent to 1,916.20 at 8:50 a.m. in New YorkProjections for April spending ranged from a decline of 0.1 percent to a gain of 0.5 percent after a previously reported increase of 0.9 percent. The Bloomberg survey median also called for incomes (PITLCHNG) to rise 0.3 percent.
The report follows figures yesterday that showed the economy contracted at a 1 percent annualized rate from January through March, the first decline in three years, as companies added to inventories at a slower pace. Consumer purchases grew at a 3.1 percent rate, reflecting a surge in spending on services including utilities and healthcare, after climbing at a 3.3 percent pace in the final three months of 2013. Economists project gross domestic product to expand at a 3.5 percent rate in the current quarter, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg survey from May 2 to May 7.

Disposable Income

Today’s figures showed disposable income, or the money left over after taxes, rose 0.2 percent after adjusting for inflation, the smallest gain this year. It climbed 0.3 percent in the prior three months. The saving rate increased to 4 percent from 3.6 percent. Wages and salaries climbed 0.2 percent, the smallest gain this year, after 0.6 percent advance in March. Spending on durable goods, including automobiles, decreased 0.5 percent adjusted for inflation, following a 3.7 percent surge. Purchases of non-durable goods, which include gasoline, fell 0.3 percent.

Services Spending

Household outlays on services dropped 0.2 percent after adjusting for inflation. The category, which includes tourism, legal help, health care, and personal care items such as haircuts, is typically difficult for the government to estimate accurately. Nordstrom Inc., the largest U.S. luxury department-store chain, this month reported first quarter profit that topped estimates, helped by sales at its lower-priced Rack outlets and online unit.
Sustained hiring gains are needed to underpin consumer purchases. Payrolls expanded by more 200,000 workers in May after a 288,000 gain the prior month that was the biggest since 2012, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists ahead of Labor Department data due on June 6. The housing recovery is driving property prices higher and generating demand for building materials and appliances. Home Depot Inc., the largest U.S. home-improvement retailer, and smaller rival Lowe’s are upbeat about sales. “Growth in key indicators such as employment, income, and consumer spending have recently begun to improve from weather-affected levels earlier in the year,” Robert Niblock, chief executive officer of Lowe’s, said on a May 21 earnings call. “Stronger job and income growth and gradually loosening credit conditions indicate that the environment for home improvement spending should remain favorable.”

Gas Prices

Higher costs at the gas pump leave consumers with less to spend on discretionary items. The price of a gallon of regular gasoline has climbed to an average $3.66 so far in May, up from this year’s low point of $3.27 in early February, according to AAA, the biggest U.S. motoring group. Today’s report also showed inflation moved closer to the 2 percent goal of Federal Reserve policy makers. The personal consumption expenditures price index rose 1.6 percent in April from a year earlier, the biggest since November 2012. The core price measure, which excludes food and fuel, rose 0.2 percent from the prior month and was up 1.4 percent from April 2013.

How The 2014 FIFA World Cup Became The Worst Publicity Stunt In History
Back in 2007, when Brazil was awarded the right to host the 2014 FIFA World Cup, the South American nation was experiencing its best economic period in decades. That year Brazil’s economy expanded by 4.5%, thanks to capital flowing into the country from foreign investors. Inflation was under control and the currency strong.  And the gap between the rich and the poor finally seemed to be shrinking a bit. The country of the future was, at last, catching up with its vast potential.
Fast-forward to May 2014consumer confidence has plummeted, and the economy contracted in consecutive quarters (from Q4 2013 to Q1 2014) for the first time since the depths of the 2008-09 global financial crisis, and about two weeks prior to hosting the biggest single-event sporting extravaganza on earth, Brazil is in the midst of a degree of chaos that in no way resembles the image of the country that was sold by its leaders to the world seven years ago.
Demonstrators during a protest against the 2014 World Cup, in Brasilia (PHOTO: Gustavo Froner/REUTERS)
Demonstrators during a protest against the 2014 World Cup, in Brasilia (PHOTO: Gustavo Froner/REUTERS)
So, what went wrong?
Part of the blame can be attributed to former president Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, whose own megalomania and ambition set him up for what could become his worst political moment. Certainly the most popular politician in Brazil by a mile, Lula da Silva personally lobbied for the World Cup to be held in Brazil for the sake of showing the world how much of a superpower Brazil can be. Truth be told, many Brazilians celebrated that idea when it was first presented, and only recently have changed their mood.
Such ambition is not strange to political leaders and their people. However Lula da Silva forgot that the best way to showcase a country’s growing capabilities, stature and confidence is by giving its citizens more social, economic and political freedom (Mexico did a much better job doing that and is on its way to overtake Brazil as Latin America’s largest economy by 2022). He chose instead to team up on behalf of his countrymen with one of the world’s allegedly most corrupt organizations to set up an event that in its original budget already cost billions, but ended up consuming even more of taxpayers’ money.
The most conservative estimates put at $11.7 billion the total investments by the government on the World Cup, US$4 billion alone on 12 new and refurbished stadiums, more than three times the cost initially projected and the most expensive World Cup ever, largely due to fraud and suspicious ties between politicians and contractors.
Even a member of Brazil’s World Cup organizing committee sparked controversy Tuesday by telling protesters angry over the tournament budget that the money had already been spent or stolen. “I want the World Cup to go off as well as possible,” Joana Havelange, the daughter of the powerful former head of the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) Ricardo Teixeira, protested on her Instagram profile. “I’m not going to fight against it, as however much was spent, stolen, already has been,”  she wrote. “If it was necessary to protest (at the spiralling cost of the event) then people should have done so beforehand,” Havelange said in the post, which was later deleted.
What’s worse: some of these stadiums may not even be ready for the tournament, let alone the enormous infrastructure projects that were sold to Brazilians as a benefit of hosting the World Cup that are yet to leave paper — a bullet train between Rio and Sao Paulo promised in 2009 to be ready for the World Cup is now projected for 2020.
Since it rose to power in 2002, Brazil’s Workers’ Party has been using propaganda in various forms to push the idea that its governance style has changed Brazil for the better. But despite recent improvements, Brazil is still one of the world’s most unequal countries, and its poorest citizens are the ones paying the biggest share of their income in tax and also the ones getting the least back from government spending. No wonder why some of them are taking to the streets to protest.
The whole idea of hosting the World Cup was, in fact, seen by the leaders of the Workers’ Party and other allied parties as the pièce de résistance to illustrate the changes they have been propogating as miraculous. The disconnect with real life is what has caused the anger of so many Brazilians, and a decision by Federal Prosecutors to ask a court to suspend the airing of government advertisements touting the benefits that the World Cup will bring to Brazil, saying the ads are “absurdly divorced from reality.”
Public opinion polls have shown a steady erosion of enthusiasm for the event among Brazilians. In 2008, the year after Brazil was announced as World Cup host, 79% of respondents to a Datafolha poll supported the event. By April this year, the number was 48%. The same poll this year showed 55% of respondents saying the event will bring more harm than good to Brazilians.
“I hope Brazil loses in the first round,” Maria de Lourdes, 39, a street vendor who participated in a recent anti-World Cup demonstration, told USA Today. She said the Brazilian team falling early would make locals lose their nationalistic goodwill toward the event. “Brazil, with all its problems, Rio with all its problems — many people still die from hunger while others are spending money on these games,” she said.
FIFA president Sepp Blatter has already manifested his worries on Brazil’s capability of hosting the World Cup. “If this happens again we have to question whether we made the wrong decision awarding the hosting rights,” Blatter told German press agency DPA when asked about the social protests that took place in Brazil during last year’s Confederations Cup, a warm-up tournament for the World Cup.
The World Cup will be held as scheduled in Brazil, but certainly not without security problems. It will also be marked not as another chance for Brazil to win a sixth world title, but as an opportunity for Brazilians to remember their leaders who are in charge of things, especially considering that the World Cup could cause some impact in the upcoming October presidential election.

Lula da Silva wanted to show the world how much of a force Brazil is. He just never realized he could take the heat for it.

McDonalds


Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Walmart Bank

How Wal-Mart and Google could steal young customers from traditional banks

It used to be that the JPMorgans of the world only worried about losing customers to Wells Fargo or Bank of America. But that universe of competitors has grown to include T-Mobile, Wal-Mart, Google and a host of other retail, tech and telecom companies that are now operating like banks.
These upstarts are gaining footing in the banking world with prepaid debit cards that customers can use to pay bills, make purchases and deposit checks via a smartphone camera -- pretty much all the things you can do with your traditional checking account. And they are piquing the interest of a highly coveted group that traditional banks have struggled to attract: young people.
new survey of nearly 4,000 Americans by Accenture found that 72 percent of people ages 18 to 34 would bank with Wal-Mart, Google or T-Mobile if they offered banking services. Of the nearly two dozen companies that researchers asked about, people were most willing to sign up with Square or PayPal because of the relationships they already have with the companies. Nearly one-third of those polled said the same about T-Mobile, Costco, Apple and Google.
bankthreat1
These companies possess a few things that could really pose a threat to banks: an existing customer base, scale and an ability to quickly adopt new technology.
Take T-mobile, which has 49.1 million wireless customers, an established base for the telecom to pitch its prepaid debit card. Many of these folks use T-Mobile's prepaid wireless phones (15.5 million) for the same reasons that make prepaid cards attractive: There's no credit check and no long-term contract. And with more people using their mobile phones to transfer money or take pictures of their checks for deposit, having the same provider manage most of the steps in that process could be appealing.
The biggest game-changer for traditional banks is Wal-Mart's incremental expansion into consumer banking. The world's largest retailer has rolled out everyday low prices on check cashing, money-transfer and checking accounts in the last few years. When Wal-Mart teamed with American Express to launch the prepaid Bluebird card as a low-cost alternative to checking accounts, the pair attracted one million customers in less than a year.
Wal-Mart fought to get a bank charter years ago, only to be foiled by lobbyists who were dead set against having the retailer go head to head with traditional banks. But Wal-Mart may be getting the last laugh as it reaps the benefits of being a bank without the headaches of being regulated like one.
bankthreat2
These outside threats are coming at a bad time for banks. Slow growth and high regulatory costs continue to put pressure on banks' return on equity, a measure of the bank's ability to squeeze profits out of shareholders' money. And while alternative payment technology may appeal to the digital unit at a bank, the folks in the card division may worry that it could cannibalize revenue, researchers at Accenture said.
Banks still have a leg up in the digital world, with vast amounts of customer and transaction data and experience in security, regulatory compliance and payment processing -- all of which are difficult to replicate, Accenture said. But the pedestals that once held the industry high off the ground and away from outside competitors is starting to crumble.

Grocery-Gym

Grocery store with gym shapes healthy results

MAY 28, 2014

While some question just how dedicated food, drug and mass retailers are to helping their customers live healthier lives, there is one store where the commitment can be measured in lost pounds and increased sales. The Hannaford supermarket in Albany, NY has a 5,600-square-foot gym that includes cardio equipment and a room for exercise classes. Best of all, it is available to customers for free.
The facility opened last October after a meeting between the chain, the local Y and the Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP). The store had extra space after a remodel and offered it up as part of a plan to tackle obesity and diabetes in the local community. The center has an associate from CDPHP on hand to register members and answer questions, a personal trainer from the Y to help with exercise plans and a dietician from Hannaford to offer nutritional advice. According to an Associated Press report, over 1,100 people have signed up for the gym to date.
Store manager Dave Farrell, who claims he has lost nearly 90 pounds in the last year, said the gym has been good for business. "We've had people use it who weren't customers and have decided to shop in the store," he told the AP. "It's definitely a win for us, but that wasn't the goal. According to a report on the Glamour website, the San Francisco International Airport has installed a yoga room for airline passengers. 
Despite the apparent success of Hannaford's store/gym concept, the company is not planning another like it.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Innovation


Marketing’s Voracious Appetite for Innovation

by Laura McLellan  |  May 23, 2014  |  Submit a Comment
In case you had any doubt that marketers are hungry for innovation, consider these three points.  First, Unilever announced the launch today of its “Unilever Foundry” program  - open to marketing start-ups working across areas including digital, content, social and mobile.  Not run by central marketing, as its existing Go Global Incubator program  is, the new program will give its own brands more opportunity in how and with which start-ups they work with.
Unilever is not alone –  Nissan, PepsiCo, AT&T, Home Depot and other major brands are in the business of purchasing equity stakes in digital marketing startups.  But startup investments – with the hope of future returns – are not the only reason marketers are investing.  They often run marketing innovation labs to find new digital marketing and digital commerce technologies, tools and techniques. Recently Gartner has seen an increase in inquiries from clients looking for process maps to quickly evaluate and prioritize new marketing technologies.  Companies are finding that their agencies’ knowledge of marketing technology may bring them up to competitive parity, but may not lead to breakthrough competitive differentiation.
Second, Gartner found in its 2014 marketing spending survey – available free atwww.gartner.com/dmspend - that 83% of large and extra-large companies allocated a portion of their marketing budget to innovation, and the average amount is 9.4% of the marketing budget, or about 1% of company revenue.  More and more marketing titles  include innovation, and Chief Innovation Officers represent a mix of traditional CTOs as well as digital marketers.  More companies (over 80%, Gartner found) have the equivalent of chief marketing technologists.  One of their most often-cited roles is as a CTO to lead the evaluation and prioritization of new marketing technologies.
Third, all you have to do is look at the rise of marketing innovation-focused events, consultants and courses available.  Marketing-focused conferences with the word Innovation in the title are both broad and industry-specific, for example “Digital Marketing Innovation Summit” and “Marketing Innovation Summit for B2B”.  We see the shift in focus of established conferences such as South by Southwest (SXSW) in 2014 from tech innovation to marketing innovation. There are also dozens of consulting firms offering marketing innovation, both traditional and hands-on, for example Inventours  and Phenomenon  Major universities such as Stanford University, Harvard and MIT are beginning to teach courses on marketing innovation.
What Unilever’s move says about innovation to me is that centralized innovation management may be too slow, have too much governance, and will operate better at the edges where marketers are busy learning how to fail early and fail often.  Marketers who operate at real-time speed have the expense budget authority to be innovative using a variety of sources – agencies, startups, crowdsourcing and, not least, customer communities.  Instead of trying to modify legacy processes from internal IT, R&D or procurement which are restrictive and slow, marketing has the opportunity to do what they do best – be creative and develop a flexible,  high-speed model for digital customer-focused marketing innovation.

Smaller Stores

Are smaller stores a big opportunity for supermarkets?

MAY 27, 2014
Becoming the latest of several grocers testing smaller formats, Publix is reportedly working on a 20,000-square-foot prototype to serve seaside communities and college towns.
The Orlando Business Journal, which broke the news, said the concept would also enable Publix to compete with niche stores such as Trader Joe's and Walmart's smaller formats. Publix, which declines to comment, has an average store size of 40,000 to 60,000 square feet.
Within the ranks of pint-sized grocers are successful limited-assortment grocers such as Trader Joe's (average 10,000 square feet) and Aldi (averaging 15,000 square feet).
Among other grocers, Hy-Vee in April opened its fourth Mainstreet concept in Sioux City. At 14,000 square feet, the Sioux City location features a produce area with 70 feet of display, as well as a butcher shop and a 22-door freezer. It also includes a pharmacy and a cafe.
Mainstreet is portrayed as a mini-version of a Hy-Vee, which average 85,000 square feet. Tim Stupka, assistant vice president of operations for Hy-Vee's northern region, told KTIV in Sioux City, "We have pretty much everything those stores have, but we don't have as many varieties."
Late last year, Kroger began testing Turkey Hill Market, averaging 7,000 square feet, opening three stores in the Columbus area. The smaller store stocks staples like fresh produce, meats, dairy, as well as prepared, packaged and frozen foods. The concept is a bigger version of Kroger's c-store-concept Turkey Hill Minit Markets, which averages 4,000 square feet. Kroger's average store is 67,000 square feet.
"Shoppers want speed, they want fresh, they want convenience, and they want value," Craig Rosenblum, a partner at Willard Bishop told The Columbus Dispatch last November when the Turkey Hill Market tests started.
In the organic/fresh foods space, Sprouts stands out for its stores, which run from 20,000 to 27,500 square feet. Competitor Whole Foods' locations average 38,000 square feet, although it opened a 21,500 square-foot location last year in Detroit.
In July, Target will open its first 20,000 square-foot TargetExpress in its hometown market of Minneapolis, near the University of Minnesota campus.
Walmart is testing a 2,500-square-foot c-store-concept called Walmart on Campus aimed at colleges, but its big push in the smaller-size range is Walmart Express (averaging 15,000 square feet) that combines a c-store and grocery. It plans to add 90 to 100 Walmart Express stores this year.